WHAT FUTURE FOR THE POLISARIO
BY: MOULAY AHMED MAOULAININ
Since 1976 the secretary general of the Polisario Mohammed Abdelaziz, and a small group of Other Leaders control the Tindouf refugee camps. Today Algeria remains the main Financial, political, and military supporter of the Polisario, though Libya and countries of the Former Soviet Union .historically backed the polisario in the past, their support has decreased Since the end of the cold war. The polisario is the product of another era prior the Collapse of the totalitarian System, although the world started to experience changes (as from The Last decade of the last Century) Polisario remained apart from such changes in the International political behaviour, No free elections, no democraty, no plurality, no freedom of Speech and expression, no free opinion and most definitely no civil society.
It is not a secret that polisario,was established by a group of young Moroccan sahraouis students, who had felt the necessity to liberate western Sahara from the Spaniards, during their several attempts to convince the then government in charge, and also the Moroccan national political parties to the urgency of claiming the territory back to the kingdom of Morocco, the answer, or rather the reaction from both sides was very disappointing, as far as the young sahraouis were concerned, which led them to opt for the creation of Polisario.
The aim was at the very beginning to start a struggle against the Spanish colonizer, the idea of disintegrating from the kingdom was not in the mind of the young sahraouis, simply because they are Moroccans as much as their parents, and ancestors. During 1975 Algeria became directly involved with the Polisario in addition to other Arab countries namely Libya, South of Yemen. And a number of the ex eastern bloc, among others the Soviet Union, and Cuba. In this particular time, and thinks to the unexpected international support to the polisario front, and the direct involvement of Algeria. It was the leadership of the polisario that planed during the same year the emigration of a number of sahraouis from their homes in the Sahara to Tindouf refugee camps. In fact the present refugees in the camps inside Algeria were victims of systematic lies and manoeuvres of the Polisario.
many observers see the shift of Polisario attitude towards the Kingdom of Morocco, being their own country, and the claim for a referendum leading to an independent state in western Sahara as a result of the inter –Arab differences. Allowing the sahraoui people to vote on a referendum seems like a simple solution, but the polisario had insisted on restricting the voter lists locked that process into more than six years of fruitless discussion. The UN became aware of the fact that referendum is in practical terms impossible to carry out since sahraouis do not live only in Morocco, but also in Algeria, Mauritania, and Mali. This means simply that there should be a change of these countries borders, in order to organize a just and fair referendum, since the countries concerned would totally reject the idea, the former general secretary of the UN confirmed that the organization of such referendum is impossible politically and technically. Recognizing this deadlock, the UN shifted its approach to encouraging direct political negotiations between Morocco and the polisario.One of the totalitarian stigmata that continue to weigh against polisario is its capacity to take part in the search for a political solution. The real desire for a dialogue even with the majority of sahraouis who have opted to remain in the territory in Morocco, and who are members of the CORCAS is absent (http://www.sahara-online.net )
THE DIVERSION OF HUMANITARIAN AID
Sahraoui refugees in the Tindouf camps depend on humanitarian aid donated by numerousUN organizations, in addition to international non-governmental organizations. It is believed And even proved that much of the humanitarian aid does not reach the refugees, instead it is in most cases sold on the black market in neighbouring countries by the Polisario. In this Respect the international community have called in numerous occasions for the Implementation of a census, and an audit system to make sure that the management of the Humanitarian aid is transparent. Both Algeria, and Polisario has refused to allow independent Oversight of its management of humanitarian assistance. Important quantities of diverted International humanitarian aid sent for refugees in Tindouf camps have been found on the Markets in Algeria, and Mauritania, but also in Mali and Nigers, some still in their original Packaging. The sums recovered would be used to finance the front, and also its leader’s way Of life, at the expense of sahraoui refugees. These diversions according to the report of the US Committee for refugees published in year 2000 “Humanitarian workers have reported that more than 30% of the children from 5 to 12 years old were underfed, more than 70% of the Children of less than 5 years old suffered from anaemia”, in its 2001 report the committee Announced “more than 15000 children are in need of shoes”, and finally in its 2003 report, its said “some donors in private, have asked for a control of the distribution of food to Make sure that the political and military leaders were not diverting the aid”
HUMAN RIGHTS ASPECT AND ITS CONSEQUENCES
The polisario is severely accused of human rights abuses : the detention, killing ,and the abuse treatment of Moroccan prisoners of war from late 70’s to 2006, other accusations are that a big number of sahraouis are kept in the Tindouf camps against their will, and do not enjoy freedom of expression. In a report published in 2003; Amnesty International concluded that “freedom of expression, association, and movement continued to be restricted in the camps controlled by the polisario near Tindouf in south western Algeria».
In 2006 a full and comprehensive report of an independent committee of inquiry into allegations of violation human rights, crimes ,abuses ,and various other irregularities brought against the polisario front, was submitted to the special political and decolonisation committee (fourth committee) of the United Nations on the 4th of October 2006.This 40page documented report deals the following aspects:• The condition of detention, the use of torture, the absence of even the minimum level of judicial process, malnutrition of prisoners, and the absence of medical care.• Forced labour ,and rape ,and The abdication of Moroccan citizens within the international recognized frontiers of Morocco
The existence of the Polisario is connected to the existence of these camps, and the existence of such refugee camps on a hostile territory in subhuman conditions over a long period is a flagrant infringement of human rights. The Polisario has constantly violated the most elementary human rights for the last 30 years. The polisario can not be the sole and legitimate representative of sahraouis, especially if we take into account that two thirds of sahraouis do live under Moroccan sovereignty and they support the substantial autonomy project(http://www.sahara-online.net ) At the same time, most of those living as refugees in Tindouf camps in Algeria back the autonomy seeing it as a solution that guarantees political, economic, and social rights of sahraouis.
CONFLICTS WITHIN POLISARIO
Recent conflicts between different factions within Polisario and that many leaders are now returning to Morocco others would if they had the chance .The internal conflict is more serious than differences over “tactics” in any case after 3 decades of isolation in a harsh environment,youngstars who have never seen their homeland, and senior officials alike rail in frustration. The Khat Achahid (line of the martyr) is a faction within the Polisario, the organization announced its existence in 2004,it accuses the polisario leadership of being undemocratic, not caring enough for the refugees, and also accusing Mohamed abdelaziz of corruption,clientism,tribalism,and for bargaining with the sufferings of the sahraoui people; having no strategy to face the international developments, and for refusing to hold the national congress required by KHAt- AL CHAHID ( see Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia)
In the absence of any real desire for dialogue with Morocco, a return to armed confrontation with Morocco is unlikely to happen, first of all polisario is not in a position to fight against the Moroccan army, and secondly although Algeria supports, and in so many respects controls polisario, it is almost certain that it would ever permit a resumption of hostilities from its soil.
The question remains: to what extent polisario is in the service of Algerian politics? And what would be the future of polisario, as it is almost certain that it has no chance to win the ongoing diplomatic battle, nor any other battle for that matter
…
vendredi 27 juillet 2007
mardi 24 juillet 2007
MOROCCO IN MORE COMFORTABLE SITUATION WITH AUTONOMY PROJECT
Morocco in more comfortable situation with autonomy project
7/20/2007
Morocco is in a "more comfortable" position with its initiative to grant substantial autonomy to its southern provinces, The Sahara, said, here Thursday, Moroccan deputy Foreign Minister Taieb Fassi Fihri.
Speaking at a meeting with national media outlets, Mr. Fassi Fihri noted that "the other parties are now under pressure", stressing the Kingdom's efforts to reach a "consensual and mutually acceptable" solution to the Sahara issue, opposing the north African country to Polisario separatists.
The Sahara dispute broke out in 1976 when the Polisario, backed by Morocco's eastern neighbor, Algeria, started laying claims to the territory, a former Spanish colony that was ceded to the North African country in 1975 under the Madrid Accord. The Polisario continues to hold thousands of Moroccans against their will in the Tindouf camps (south western Algeria).
Recalling that Morocco's autonomy initiative was a break with the past, he noted that it was devised in response to the calls of the international community and the United Nations security Council’s resolution that called on the parties to the dispute to get out of the impasse and enter into negotiations "in good faith and without preconditions.”
Echoing him, Moroccan Interior Minister, Chakib Benmoussa, stressed that Morocco would take part in the second round of negotiations on Sahara, due in Manhasset (New York outskirts) on August 10, “in a climate of trust, confidence and openness.”
Morocco “is firmly convinced of the justness and the credibility of its cause”, he went on, adding that the initiative is likely to signal a new page in the history of the Great Maghreb, based on cooperation and solidarity, so that the region’s countries (Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Mauritania and Libya) can face up to challenges, face threats lurking around Maghreban people and establish safety and stability in this area, which is targeted by dangers and covetousness.
In accordance with the UNSG resolution 1754 (of April 30) that called upon the parties to the dispute to enter into negotiations "in good faith and without preconditions," Morocco and the Polisario held the first round of UN-sponsored negotiations on the Sahara in Manhasset. The parties have agreed to resume talks in the same venue in the second week of August.
The United Nations Security Council, which convened on July 12 in a closed-door session to discuss the UN Secretary-General, Ban Ki-Moon’s report on the status and progress of the negotiations on Sahara, voiced hope that the parties will use the next round of negotiations to engage "in good faith in substantial negotiations."
Source ( CORCAS )
7/20/2007
Morocco is in a "more comfortable" position with its initiative to grant substantial autonomy to its southern provinces, The Sahara, said, here Thursday, Moroccan deputy Foreign Minister Taieb Fassi Fihri.
Speaking at a meeting with national media outlets, Mr. Fassi Fihri noted that "the other parties are now under pressure", stressing the Kingdom's efforts to reach a "consensual and mutually acceptable" solution to the Sahara issue, opposing the north African country to Polisario separatists.
The Sahara dispute broke out in 1976 when the Polisario, backed by Morocco's eastern neighbor, Algeria, started laying claims to the territory, a former Spanish colony that was ceded to the North African country in 1975 under the Madrid Accord. The Polisario continues to hold thousands of Moroccans against their will in the Tindouf camps (south western Algeria).
Recalling that Morocco's autonomy initiative was a break with the past, he noted that it was devised in response to the calls of the international community and the United Nations security Council’s resolution that called on the parties to the dispute to get out of the impasse and enter into negotiations "in good faith and without preconditions.”
Echoing him, Moroccan Interior Minister, Chakib Benmoussa, stressed that Morocco would take part in the second round of negotiations on Sahara, due in Manhasset (New York outskirts) on August 10, “in a climate of trust, confidence and openness.”
Morocco “is firmly convinced of the justness and the credibility of its cause”, he went on, adding that the initiative is likely to signal a new page in the history of the Great Maghreb, based on cooperation and solidarity, so that the region’s countries (Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Mauritania and Libya) can face up to challenges, face threats lurking around Maghreban people and establish safety and stability in this area, which is targeted by dangers and covetousness.
In accordance with the UNSG resolution 1754 (of April 30) that called upon the parties to the dispute to enter into negotiations "in good faith and without preconditions," Morocco and the Polisario held the first round of UN-sponsored negotiations on the Sahara in Manhasset. The parties have agreed to resume talks in the same venue in the second week of August.
The United Nations Security Council, which convened on July 12 in a closed-door session to discuss the UN Secretary-General, Ban Ki-Moon’s report on the status and progress of the negotiations on Sahara, voiced hope that the parties will use the next round of negotiations to engage "in good faith in substantial negotiations."
Source ( CORCAS )
lundi 23 juillet 2007
TCHAD DENIES CATEGORICALLY RESTORATION OF ANY DIPLOMATIC TIES WITH THE SO-CALLED "RASD"
TCHAD denies categorically restoration of any
Diplomatic ties with the so-called “RASD”
Tchad denies categorically any information concerning the restoration of diplomatic ties between the Republic of Tchad and pseudo”RASD .
In a statement published in its web site, Tchad underlines that information brought in this respect by a local newspaper is “ without any basis, and riddled with lies” the statement added that “no agreement to restore diplomatic ties between Tchad and “RASD”was signed” in this respect.
“Consequently, we require from the national and international opinion public not to be abused by this kind of abject and insane handling» concluded the statement.
The embassy of the republic of Tchad in Algiers, denies equally, in a statement published on Sunday by the Algerian newspaper “liberte” information brought by this newspaper claiming that Tchad had restored diplomatic ties with the so-called “RASD”.
Source (MAP)
See : http://www.primature-tchad.org
Diplomatic ties with the so-called “RASD”
Tchad denies categorically any information concerning the restoration of diplomatic ties between the Republic of Tchad and pseudo”RASD .
In a statement published in its web site, Tchad underlines that information brought in this respect by a local newspaper is “ without any basis, and riddled with lies” the statement added that “no agreement to restore diplomatic ties between Tchad and “RASD”was signed” in this respect.
“Consequently, we require from the national and international opinion public not to be abused by this kind of abject and insane handling» concluded the statement.
The embassy of the republic of Tchad in Algiers, denies equally, in a statement published on Sunday by the Algerian newspaper “liberte” information brought by this newspaper claiming that Tchad had restored diplomatic ties with the so-called “RASD”.
Source (MAP)
See : http://www.primature-tchad.org
vendredi 13 juillet 2007
SWISSERLAND IN FAVOUR OF A SOLUTION THAT SATISFIES ALL PARTIES CONCERNED
SWISSERLAND IS IN FAVOR OF A SOLUTION THAT
SATISFIES ALL PARTIES CONCERNED
13 /07/2007
In a friendly and constructive atmosphere the Swiss delegation led by Mrs Christine Egerszegi-obrist leader of the Swiss national council (federal parliament) met at the headquarter of the CORCAS in Rabat, on Wednesday 11th of July the chairman of the royal advisory council for Saharan affairs (CORCAS) Mr Khalihenna Ould Errachid.
This meeting was an opportunity to present to Mrs Egerszegi-Obrist and the members of the Swiss delegation an historic outline concerning the Sahara issues, and a general idea of the Moroccan initiative for negotiating an autonomy statute for the Saharan region.
Mr Khelihenna Ould Errachid explained equally to the Swiss delegation the attributions of the CORCAS and its contribution to the development of southern provinces, in addition to the elaboration of the Moroccan proposal.
Mr Khelihenna Ould Errachid pointed out the main and important achievements in the southern provinces of the kingdom of Morocco, and freedom and peace spread out all over the region.
This meeting took place with the presence particularly of the Swiss ambassador in Morocco Mr Christian Dunant, and also the general secretary of the CORCAS Mr Maouelainin Ben Khalihanna Maouelainin.
Mrs Egerszgi-Obrist expressed, at the end of the meeting, her satisfaction as to the way Morocco is tackling the Sahara issue, and made it clear that her country is advocating a solution to Sahara question which is acceptable by all parties.
SOURCE( CORCAS)
SATISFIES ALL PARTIES CONCERNED
13 /07/2007
In a friendly and constructive atmosphere the Swiss delegation led by Mrs Christine Egerszegi-obrist leader of the Swiss national council (federal parliament) met at the headquarter of the CORCAS in Rabat, on Wednesday 11th of July the chairman of the royal advisory council for Saharan affairs (CORCAS) Mr Khalihenna Ould Errachid.
This meeting was an opportunity to present to Mrs Egerszegi-Obrist and the members of the Swiss delegation an historic outline concerning the Sahara issues, and a general idea of the Moroccan initiative for negotiating an autonomy statute for the Saharan region.
Mr Khelihenna Ould Errachid explained equally to the Swiss delegation the attributions of the CORCAS and its contribution to the development of southern provinces, in addition to the elaboration of the Moroccan proposal.
Mr Khelihenna Ould Errachid pointed out the main and important achievements in the southern provinces of the kingdom of Morocco, and freedom and peace spread out all over the region.
This meeting took place with the presence particularly of the Swiss ambassador in Morocco Mr Christian Dunant, and also the general secretary of the CORCAS Mr Maouelainin Ben Khalihanna Maouelainin.
Mrs Egerszgi-Obrist expressed, at the end of the meeting, her satisfaction as to the way Morocco is tackling the Sahara issue, and made it clear that her country is advocating a solution to Sahara question which is acceptable by all parties.
SOURCE( CORCAS)
jeudi 12 juillet 2007
AN IMPORTANT PARLIAMENTARY DELEGATION FROM THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO VISITS CORCAS
An important Parliamentary delegation from The Democratic republic of CONGO visits CORCAS
12/07/2007
An important delegation of members of Parliament from the Democratic republic of CONGO led by the leader of the national assembly Mr Vital Karmerhe, was received by the chairman Khellihenna Ould Errachid at the headquarter of the Royal Advisory Council For Saharan Affairs ( CORCAS) , in RABAT, on Tuesday 10th of June.
It is notable that Mr KARMERHE is leading a delegation of MP’s, which includes Mr Katende wandaye reporter of the national assembly of Congo, Mayo Maybeke cabinet director and deputy leader of the national assembly, in addition the following MP’s: Giala Mobuto, Boji Sangara Aime, and Bussa Tongba Jean-lucien.
During the meeting the chairman of CORCAS explained the historical background of the dispute over Western Sahara, the vital role of the CORCAS in terms of direct negotiations between the kingdom of Morocco , and the Polisario front, and the importance of the Moroccan substantial autonomy proposal, as a basis for any fair and just political settlement to the over three decade western Sahara conflict.
At the end of this fruitful meeting MR Vital Karmerhe confirmed his country’s full support to the Moroccan national territory integrity, and expressed his approval to the Moroccan proposal submitted to the UN Security Council. He added “we have always confirmed that the the Moroccan territorial integrity should be safeguarded, it is in the interest of the entire Moroccan population that unity is safeguarded”
SOURCE ( CORCAS)
12/07/2007
An important delegation of members of Parliament from the Democratic republic of CONGO led by the leader of the national assembly Mr Vital Karmerhe, was received by the chairman Khellihenna Ould Errachid at the headquarter of the Royal Advisory Council For Saharan Affairs ( CORCAS) , in RABAT, on Tuesday 10th of June.
It is notable that Mr KARMERHE is leading a delegation of MP’s, which includes Mr Katende wandaye reporter of the national assembly of Congo, Mayo Maybeke cabinet director and deputy leader of the national assembly, in addition the following MP’s: Giala Mobuto, Boji Sangara Aime, and Bussa Tongba Jean-lucien.
During the meeting the chairman of CORCAS explained the historical background of the dispute over Western Sahara, the vital role of the CORCAS in terms of direct negotiations between the kingdom of Morocco , and the Polisario front, and the importance of the Moroccan substantial autonomy proposal, as a basis for any fair and just political settlement to the over three decade western Sahara conflict.
At the end of this fruitful meeting MR Vital Karmerhe confirmed his country’s full support to the Moroccan national territory integrity, and expressed his approval to the Moroccan proposal submitted to the UN Security Council. He added “we have always confirmed that the the Moroccan territorial integrity should be safeguarded, it is in the interest of the entire Moroccan population that unity is safeguarded”
SOURCE ( CORCAS)
mercredi 11 juillet 2007
President Sarkozy :sahara is not a matter of discord between algeria and France
President SARKOZY: Sahara is not a matter
Of discord between Algeria and France
11/7/2007
The French president NICOLAS SARCOZYdeclared on Tuesday 10th of July 2007 in Algiers that “the question of Sahara should not be a matter of discord between Algeria and France”
“Frankly I have enough problems to sort out, I acknowledge the complexity of the question, and the UN has voted for a resolution qualified, even by president Bouteflika, interesting” he said in a press conference at the end of his talks, followed by a lunch with the Algerian president
“President Bouteflika told me that he knew the French traditional position, and he did not ask me to renounce such a position, he explained, according to his own arguments, that I respect the Algerian position. As to me i have not mentioned any matter of discord between France and Algeria” he added.
According to Mr SARKOZY “what is important, that things should progress, and sometime the MAGHREB union could be done on the basis of entente, between Algeria and Morocco, as we can not imagine the Maghreb without Morocco and Algeria
source (MAP)
Of discord between Algeria and France
11/7/2007
The French president NICOLAS SARCOZYdeclared on Tuesday 10th of July 2007 in Algiers that “the question of Sahara should not be a matter of discord between Algeria and France”
“Frankly I have enough problems to sort out, I acknowledge the complexity of the question, and the UN has voted for a resolution qualified, even by president Bouteflika, interesting” he said in a press conference at the end of his talks, followed by a lunch with the Algerian president
“President Bouteflika told me that he knew the French traditional position, and he did not ask me to renounce such a position, he explained, according to his own arguments, that I respect the Algerian position. As to me i have not mentioned any matter of discord between France and Algeria” he added.
According to Mr SARKOZY “what is important, that things should progress, and sometime the MAGHREB union could be done on the basis of entente, between Algeria and Morocco, as we can not imagine the Maghreb without Morocco and Algeria
source (MAP)
mardi 10 juillet 2007
A GERMAN DELEGATION VISITS CORCAS
A GERMAN DELEGATION VISITS CORCAS
10/7/2007
Mr khalihenna Ould Errachid , chairman of the royal advisory council for Saharan affairs received yesterday morning at the headquarter of the council a German delegation which include seven members ,friends of Morocco , led by senator Dr Michael Freytag, in company of Mr Jurgen Klimke, the local finance minister of Hamburg.
During the meeting, Mr Khalihenna Ould Errachid explained to the German delegation the evolution of the Sahara question, including the content of the Moroccan substantial autonomy initiative for the region of Sahara, in addition to the direct negotiations between Morocco and the Polisario front which took place in Manhasset near New York city on the 18th and 19th of June under the auspices of the United Nations. The CORCAS chairman reminded the German delegation of the main historical phases of the Sahara conflict.
Members of the German delegation have asked several questions about the nature of the conflict, and also about efforts made by Morocco with the aim of reaching a fair and final settlement to the conflict that lasted over three decades.
The German delegation showed a great interest in the Moroccan proposal, and expressed their support to efforts made to achieve political solution to the dispute over Sahara.
It is notable that Dr Maouelainin the secretary general of the council, as well as a number of CORCAS members took part in yesterday’s meeting
Source(CORCAS)
10/7/2007
Mr khalihenna Ould Errachid , chairman of the royal advisory council for Saharan affairs received yesterday morning at the headquarter of the council a German delegation which include seven members ,friends of Morocco , led by senator Dr Michael Freytag, in company of Mr Jurgen Klimke, the local finance minister of Hamburg.
During the meeting, Mr Khalihenna Ould Errachid explained to the German delegation the evolution of the Sahara question, including the content of the Moroccan substantial autonomy initiative for the region of Sahara, in addition to the direct negotiations between Morocco and the Polisario front which took place in Manhasset near New York city on the 18th and 19th of June under the auspices of the United Nations. The CORCAS chairman reminded the German delegation of the main historical phases of the Sahara conflict.
Members of the German delegation have asked several questions about the nature of the conflict, and also about efforts made by Morocco with the aim of reaching a fair and final settlement to the conflict that lasted over three decades.
The German delegation showed a great interest in the Moroccan proposal, and expressed their support to efforts made to achieve political solution to the dispute over Sahara.
It is notable that Dr Maouelainin the secretary general of the council, as well as a number of CORCAS members took part in yesterday’s meeting
Source(CORCAS)
lundi 9 juillet 2007
THE PRESIDENT OF CORCAS MEETS THE VICE PRESIDENT OF THE MEXICAN SENATE
The president of CORCAS meets the vice president of the Mexican Senate
9/7/2007
The president of the royal advisory council for Saharan affairs (CORCAS) Mr Khalihenna Ould Errachid had talks last week in Rabat, with the vice president of the Mexican senate Mr Francisco Augustan Arroyo Vieyra, about the latest events concerning the Western Sahara issue. Particularly after the first round of negotiations which took place at Manhasset near New York City on the 18th and 19th of last monthMore……
In a statement to the media the Mexican senate vice president indicated that his country wishes the success of such negociatons, and that parties concerned will reach a final settlement to the Sahara issue in order to achieve peace, and consolidate stability in the region.
The Mexican delegation, led by the senate vice president Mr Francisco Augustan Arroyo Vieyra is formed of Mr Salomon Jara Cuy president of the foreign affairs commission for Africa, and Jose Julian Sacramento Garza secretary of the same commission
During the three day visit to Morocco the Mexican delegation met last Thursday the Moroccan minister of cooperation and foreign affairs Mr Mohammed Benaissa.The president of the Mexican delegation has expressed his appreciation to the overall efforts made by Morocco to reach a final solution to the Sahara question, under the auspices of the United Nations , he even showed his admiration to the achievement accomplished in The Kingdom in various fields during the last decade or so.
IT is worth mentioning that the CORCAS diplomatic activities aiming at explaining the real aspects of the western Sahara dispute between the Kingdom of Morocco and the Polisario front, and the substantial autonomy project put forward by Morocco as basis for any negotiations leading to a fair, just, and final settlement to the over three decade dispute over western Sahara, these activities have increased particularly after the adoption of resolution 1754 by the UN security council.
The CORCAS representation in the Moroccan delegation to the first round negotiations in Manhasset reflects the vital role that CORCAS was and still is playing since its creation by his Majesty King Mohammed VI.
SOURCE (CORCAS)
9/7/2007
The president of the royal advisory council for Saharan affairs (CORCAS) Mr Khalihenna Ould Errachid had talks last week in Rabat, with the vice president of the Mexican senate Mr Francisco Augustan Arroyo Vieyra, about the latest events concerning the Western Sahara issue. Particularly after the first round of negotiations which took place at Manhasset near New York City on the 18th and 19th of last monthMore……
In a statement to the media the Mexican senate vice president indicated that his country wishes the success of such negociatons, and that parties concerned will reach a final settlement to the Sahara issue in order to achieve peace, and consolidate stability in the region.
The Mexican delegation, led by the senate vice president Mr Francisco Augustan Arroyo Vieyra is formed of Mr Salomon Jara Cuy president of the foreign affairs commission for Africa, and Jose Julian Sacramento Garza secretary of the same commission
During the three day visit to Morocco the Mexican delegation met last Thursday the Moroccan minister of cooperation and foreign affairs Mr Mohammed Benaissa.The president of the Mexican delegation has expressed his appreciation to the overall efforts made by Morocco to reach a final solution to the Sahara question, under the auspices of the United Nations , he even showed his admiration to the achievement accomplished in The Kingdom in various fields during the last decade or so.
IT is worth mentioning that the CORCAS diplomatic activities aiming at explaining the real aspects of the western Sahara dispute between the Kingdom of Morocco and the Polisario front, and the substantial autonomy project put forward by Morocco as basis for any negotiations leading to a fair, just, and final settlement to the over three decade dispute over western Sahara, these activities have increased particularly after the adoption of resolution 1754 by the UN security council.
The CORCAS representation in the Moroccan delegation to the first round negotiations in Manhasset reflects the vital role that CORCAS was and still is playing since its creation by his Majesty King Mohammed VI.
SOURCE (CORCAS)
vendredi 6 juillet 2007
MOROCCAN PROPOSAL FOR A SUBSTANTIAL AUTONOMY
MOROCCAN PROPOSAL FOR A SUBSTANTIAL AUTONOMY
TAOUFIQ GAZOULIT, MA
JOURNALIST/RESEARCHER
6/7/2007
On Wednesday, April 11, 2007 the Moroccan government submitted its proposal for a substantial autonomy for the Western Sahara region to the newly nominated secretary general of the United Nations organization, taking the first step, which the international community has called for repeatedly, toward a political direct dialogue with the parties concerned ie Algeria and the Polisario front.The conflict between the Kingdom of Morocco, and the Algerian-backed polisario front, dates back more than three decades. From 1975 until a UN-brokered cease-fire agreement in 1991.The terms of 1991 cease-fire agreement were not fully met until august 2005, when the polisario, under pressure from the international community released the over 400Moroccan prisoners of war. During their very long capture the Moroccan POW faced barbaric torture, and forced labour from both: the Algerian and polisario military intelligence services. On april2003, the France libertés foundation led an international mission of inquiry on the conditions of detention of Moroccan POW long held in the refugee camps in Algeria, the French foundation produced detailed accusations of torture, forced labour, arbitary detentions, and summary executions of captured soldiers, that revealed the true nature of the polisario front, which had long portrayed itself as victim.Allowing the sahraoui people to vote on a referendum seems like a simple solution, but the polisario had insisted on restricting the voter lists locked that process into more than six years of fruitless discussion. The UN became aware of the fact that referendum is in practical terms impossible to carry out since sahraouis do not live only in Morocco, but also in Algeria, Mauritania, and Mali. This means simply that there should be a change of these countries borders, in order to organize a just and fair referendum, since the countries concerned would totally reject the idea, the general secretary of the UN confirmed that the organization of such referendum is impossible politically and technically.Recognizing this deadlock, the UN shifted its approach to encouraging direct negotiations between Morocco and the polisario.The Moroccan Proposal for substantial Autonomy is the first, and the only practical proposed framework for a political solution, and from it the two sides can craft a final agreement. IT preserves Moroccan sovereignty, but gives the Western Sahara sufficient autonomy to become effectively self-governing. The autonomous region would have:
1. regional parliament and president of a local government2. right to create local laws, as long as they do not contradict Morocco’s constitution3. regional judiciary to rule regarding local laws4. control of local police, schools, economy, infrastructure, taxation and housing5. Moroccan national emblems, including Moroccan flag, currency, stamps and national anthem
The Kingdom of Morocco would control:
1. external defence and national security2. foreign relations3. national judiciary4. religious affairs, with King Mohamed 6 as the highest religious authority
The Moroccan Substantial autonomy Plan should be seen by parties concerned as an initiative that achieves the principal of self-determination, through a free, modern and democratic expression regarding the autonomy statute .It is in no doubt in conformity with international legality as well as with international norms, and standards applicable in area of autonomy.Despite the refusal of the polisario front of the Moroccan Autonomy Plan (and for that matter Algeria) the polisario could still come to reason .It is of no use to be stubborn and remain in error.Today Morocco enables the polisario to open the road to hope, to make people forget the suffering, the errors and moral failures of the past.Today a golden opportunity is offered to the Polisario to accept the only solution possible, indeed the best one is a Substantial Autonomy under the Moroccan Sovereignty.
The Moroccan plan’s language was purposefully broad to allow for open debate, Morocco remains open to this solution that preserves its sovereignty, and territorial integrity, and that allows populations to manage directly, and democratically their local affairs .Morocco is ready to cooperate with other parties, as well as with the general secretary, and his special representative to reach a solution that is accepted by all parties.To this aim, Morocco is ready to engage in a constructive negotiation to contribute concretely to its success. In the pursuit of this objective the kingdom of Morocco hopes to rely on the good will of all those who are committed to create favourable conditions for a realistic and consensus –based solution of the western Sahara conflict, a solution that enables the populations in the refugee camps inside Algeria to finally join their families and that allow Maghreb states to find unity and solidarity
.
TAOUFIQ GAZOULIT, MA
JOURNALIST/RESEARCHER
6/7/2007
On Wednesday, April 11, 2007 the Moroccan government submitted its proposal for a substantial autonomy for the Western Sahara region to the newly nominated secretary general of the United Nations organization, taking the first step, which the international community has called for repeatedly, toward a political direct dialogue with the parties concerned ie Algeria and the Polisario front.The conflict between the Kingdom of Morocco, and the Algerian-backed polisario front, dates back more than three decades. From 1975 until a UN-brokered cease-fire agreement in 1991.The terms of 1991 cease-fire agreement were not fully met until august 2005, when the polisario, under pressure from the international community released the over 400Moroccan prisoners of war. During their very long capture the Moroccan POW faced barbaric torture, and forced labour from both: the Algerian and polisario military intelligence services. On april2003, the France libertés foundation led an international mission of inquiry on the conditions of detention of Moroccan POW long held in the refugee camps in Algeria, the French foundation produced detailed accusations of torture, forced labour, arbitary detentions, and summary executions of captured soldiers, that revealed the true nature of the polisario front, which had long portrayed itself as victim.Allowing the sahraoui people to vote on a referendum seems like a simple solution, but the polisario had insisted on restricting the voter lists locked that process into more than six years of fruitless discussion. The UN became aware of the fact that referendum is in practical terms impossible to carry out since sahraouis do not live only in Morocco, but also in Algeria, Mauritania, and Mali. This means simply that there should be a change of these countries borders, in order to organize a just and fair referendum, since the countries concerned would totally reject the idea, the general secretary of the UN confirmed that the organization of such referendum is impossible politically and technically.Recognizing this deadlock, the UN shifted its approach to encouraging direct negotiations between Morocco and the polisario.The Moroccan Proposal for substantial Autonomy is the first, and the only practical proposed framework for a political solution, and from it the two sides can craft a final agreement. IT preserves Moroccan sovereignty, but gives the Western Sahara sufficient autonomy to become effectively self-governing. The autonomous region would have:
1. regional parliament and president of a local government2. right to create local laws, as long as they do not contradict Morocco’s constitution3. regional judiciary to rule regarding local laws4. control of local police, schools, economy, infrastructure, taxation and housing5. Moroccan national emblems, including Moroccan flag, currency, stamps and national anthem
The Kingdom of Morocco would control:
1. external defence and national security2. foreign relations3. national judiciary4. religious affairs, with King Mohamed 6 as the highest religious authority
The Moroccan Substantial autonomy Plan should be seen by parties concerned as an initiative that achieves the principal of self-determination, through a free, modern and democratic expression regarding the autonomy statute .It is in no doubt in conformity with international legality as well as with international norms, and standards applicable in area of autonomy.Despite the refusal of the polisario front of the Moroccan Autonomy Plan (and for that matter Algeria) the polisario could still come to reason .It is of no use to be stubborn and remain in error.Today Morocco enables the polisario to open the road to hope, to make people forget the suffering, the errors and moral failures of the past.Today a golden opportunity is offered to the Polisario to accept the only solution possible, indeed the best one is a Substantial Autonomy under the Moroccan Sovereignty.
The Moroccan plan’s language was purposefully broad to allow for open debate, Morocco remains open to this solution that preserves its sovereignty, and territorial integrity, and that allows populations to manage directly, and democratically their local affairs .Morocco is ready to cooperate with other parties, as well as with the general secretary, and his special representative to reach a solution that is accepted by all parties.To this aim, Morocco is ready to engage in a constructive negotiation to contribute concretely to its success. In the pursuit of this objective the kingdom of Morocco hopes to rely on the good will of all those who are committed to create favourable conditions for a realistic and consensus –based solution of the western Sahara conflict, a solution that enables the populations in the refugee camps inside Algeria to finally join their families and that allow Maghreb states to find unity and solidarity
.
mardi 3 juillet 2007
the Moroccan substantial autonomy proposal should be the basis of any direct negociations concerning west sahara
- THE MOROCCAN SUBSTANTIAL AUTONOMY PROPOSAL SHOULD BE THE BASIS OF ANY DIRECT NEGOCIATIONS CONCERNING WESTERN SAHARA
BY: MOULAY AHMED MAOUELAININ *
IT is notable that the world political landscape knows a number of disputes, and conflicts that are threatening directly, or indirectly peace, and stability around the world. In fact some of these conflicts deserve the international community full attention in order to solve them, having said that others are simply unfounded, but unfortunately continue to exist for some reasons or others, draining out financial resources, as well as putting tremendous pressure on the international community. As to the Western Sahara conflict, it is in my view a result of regional politics in the North African area, during the seventies, and particularly between the two most powerful countries in the region i.e. : Morocco and Algeria. Vital economic and strategic interests where undoubtedly behind the three decade crisis over Western Sahara.
IT is known to everybody that historically speaking Western Sahara was always an integral part of the kingdom of Morocco, until 1884 when the Spanish started invading the area, by 1912 Morocco was colonized by two major European powers: France and Spain. The process of decolonization of Moroccan territories which were occupied by Spain took place through negotiations. In this respect, Morocco regained the north zone in April 1956, Tarfaya and Tan Tan in 1958, Sidi ifni in1969, and the Sahara in 1975.
The Moroccan proposal for a substantial autonomy transfers competences and creates local institutions (legislative and executive) within the framework of Moroccan sovereignty .again autonomy is seen by experts in international law as a very advanced form of self determination. This plan was prepared mainly by the Royal Advisory Council for Sahara Affairs, under a direct supervision of the King Mohamed VI (see http://www.corcas.com) and it has been subject to large consultations with the sahraoui populations and Moroccan political parties.
As to The Polisario, it is definitely not the sole and legitimate representative of the sahraoui, because the overwhelming majority of sahraoui opted to remain Moroccans and they are represented in the CORCAS which was established by the King Mohamed VI. Sahraouis back the process of autonomy under the Moroccan sovereignty. They are proud to belong to the Moroccan nation. Throughout the history not even one sahraoui opted for the separatism, not even the parents and families of the present polisario leadership. It is obvious that Morocco seeks a final settlement to this dispute, which is in a way a result of the cold war and the inter- Arab differences, this conflict did not help to effectively build the Maghreb Union. The dispute over Western Sahara did not help either the promotion of democracy in the region nor making use of natural resources for the people of the region. The aim behind the Moroccan proposal is that Sahraouis claims will be satisfied, and Morocco remains sovereign over its southern territories. It is crystal clear that the international community is welcoming Moroccan autonomy project .it is seen as a constructive and just proposal for all parties, this viewpoint was felt by the members of Moroccan delegations all over the world capitals ,and ,indeed in the UN headquarters ,during the discussions led by members of the security council.
Generally speaking the parliament of the Sahara will be formed by members elected by sahraoui tribes, and by members elected by direct universal suffrage by sahraouis .as to the executive authority in the Sahara autonomous region will lie with a head of government, to be elected by the regional parliament. It will have the financial resources required for its development in areas such as: economic sector, region’s local administration, police forces and jurisdictions, infrastructure, the social sector, cultural affairs and environment. The Moroccan substantial proposal requires an amendment of the Moroccan constitution, in order to incorporate the autonomy statute into it. The kingdom of Morocco will keep its powers in terms of defence, foreign affairs and international relations, and the country’s judicial order. In addition to the constitutional and the religious prerogatives of the King.
The secretary general personal envoy for Sahara Van Walsum stated ( in his press conference at the headquarter of the UN , after presenting his report to the UN chief) that the Moroccan proposal to grant substantial autonomy to the western Sahara “was the result of an extended political process of national and international consultations” whereas the polisario proposal, the UN envoy added “it is consistent with polisario well known positions” .As far as the role of Algeria in the conflict Mr Walsum recognized the pre-eminent role of Algeria, “Algeria has in this whole dossier (Sahara issue) played an absolutely pre-eminent ,dominant role ever since1975” this is the first time that a senior UN official dealing directly with the western Sahara issue that recognized in a diplomatic Worthing to what extent the Algerians are directly involved in the western Sahara dispute ,and even in the decision making on behalf of the separatist movement called polisario while Algiers keeps insisting that “it is not a part in the conflict”.
It was certain that the Security Council would go along with the newly nominated general, secretary of the UN Ban ki-moon’s recommendation, a move that would step up pressure for a political negotiated solution. IN his report to the Security Council Ban Ki-moon reiterated his call to the parties, including Algeria to accept the principle of direct negotiations, without any preconditions in order to reach a settlement to the three decade old Sahara conflict, he also quoted his personal envoy’s analysis saying that “the security council had consistently made it clear that it would not impose a solution to the question of western Sahara, which had led him to the conclusion that there were only two options: either indefinite prolongation of the impasse, or negotiations without preconditions between the parties aimed at achieving a mutually acceptable political solution . In fact members of the UN security council are explicitly asking Algeria to take part in any form of direct dialogue with Morocco searching for a final settlement to this conflict .it seems to me that the international community is “fed up” with the Algerian double standard policy towards the western Sahara issue…sometimes it presents itself as a concerned party, other times as an important actor, or as a party in the settlement of the dispute. If Algeria is willing ,as it claims ,to help sahraoui refugees in its own territory in Tindouf, then it has to lift the military and security blockade imposed around the camps, it would then find out that Sahraoui refugees will automatically exert the self –determination by walking from the camps and returning to their homeland in Morocco. Algeria should abandon its old dreams, and stop its non- stop allegations which are in so many respects unconvincing at all, in order to pave the way, and help to create a healthy atmosphere towards a settlement to the Western Sahara issue.
On Monday,april30,2007 the UN security council “ calls upon the parties to enter into negotiations without preconditions in good faith, taking into account the developments of the last months, with a view to achieving a just, lasting and mutually acceptable political solution”Not only the security council called for direct negotiations, but took note of the Moroccan proposal presented by Morocco to the UN general secretary “ welcome credible and serious Moroccan efforts to move the process forward towards resolution” this is in my view an explicit recognition that the Moroccan proposal is the only and unique one to be taken into consideration as a basis for any direct negotiations ,whereas the Polisario proposal did not bring any new elements nor practical alternative to the present deadlock
My view is that Algeria and the polisario would continue to create obstacles to the peace process advocated by the UN Security Council, although the polisario agreed to enter direct negotiations with Morocco, and Algeria welcomed the Security Council resolution
The Moroccan position is unequivocal; the Western Sahara is an integral part of the Kingdom of Morocco, whether Algeria and polisario come to term with the UN Security Council resolution or not.
BY: MOULAY AHMED MAOUELAININ *
IT is notable that the world political landscape knows a number of disputes, and conflicts that are threatening directly, or indirectly peace, and stability around the world. In fact some of these conflicts deserve the international community full attention in order to solve them, having said that others are simply unfounded, but unfortunately continue to exist for some reasons or others, draining out financial resources, as well as putting tremendous pressure on the international community. As to the Western Sahara conflict, it is in my view a result of regional politics in the North African area, during the seventies, and particularly between the two most powerful countries in the region i.e. : Morocco and Algeria. Vital economic and strategic interests where undoubtedly behind the three decade crisis over Western Sahara.
IT is known to everybody that historically speaking Western Sahara was always an integral part of the kingdom of Morocco, until 1884 when the Spanish started invading the area, by 1912 Morocco was colonized by two major European powers: France and Spain. The process of decolonization of Moroccan territories which were occupied by Spain took place through negotiations. In this respect, Morocco regained the north zone in April 1956, Tarfaya and Tan Tan in 1958, Sidi ifni in1969, and the Sahara in 1975.
The Moroccan proposal for a substantial autonomy transfers competences and creates local institutions (legislative and executive) within the framework of Moroccan sovereignty .again autonomy is seen by experts in international law as a very advanced form of self determination. This plan was prepared mainly by the Royal Advisory Council for Sahara Affairs, under a direct supervision of the King Mohamed VI (see http://www.corcas.com) and it has been subject to large consultations with the sahraoui populations and Moroccan political parties.
As to The Polisario, it is definitely not the sole and legitimate representative of the sahraoui, because the overwhelming majority of sahraoui opted to remain Moroccans and they are represented in the CORCAS which was established by the King Mohamed VI. Sahraouis back the process of autonomy under the Moroccan sovereignty. They are proud to belong to the Moroccan nation. Throughout the history not even one sahraoui opted for the separatism, not even the parents and families of the present polisario leadership. It is obvious that Morocco seeks a final settlement to this dispute, which is in a way a result of the cold war and the inter- Arab differences, this conflict did not help to effectively build the Maghreb Union. The dispute over Western Sahara did not help either the promotion of democracy in the region nor making use of natural resources for the people of the region. The aim behind the Moroccan proposal is that Sahraouis claims will be satisfied, and Morocco remains sovereign over its southern territories. It is crystal clear that the international community is welcoming Moroccan autonomy project .it is seen as a constructive and just proposal for all parties, this viewpoint was felt by the members of Moroccan delegations all over the world capitals ,and ,indeed in the UN headquarters ,during the discussions led by members of the security council.
Generally speaking the parliament of the Sahara will be formed by members elected by sahraoui tribes, and by members elected by direct universal suffrage by sahraouis .as to the executive authority in the Sahara autonomous region will lie with a head of government, to be elected by the regional parliament. It will have the financial resources required for its development in areas such as: economic sector, region’s local administration, police forces and jurisdictions, infrastructure, the social sector, cultural affairs and environment. The Moroccan substantial proposal requires an amendment of the Moroccan constitution, in order to incorporate the autonomy statute into it. The kingdom of Morocco will keep its powers in terms of defence, foreign affairs and international relations, and the country’s judicial order. In addition to the constitutional and the religious prerogatives of the King.
The secretary general personal envoy for Sahara Van Walsum stated ( in his press conference at the headquarter of the UN , after presenting his report to the UN chief) that the Moroccan proposal to grant substantial autonomy to the western Sahara “was the result of an extended political process of national and international consultations” whereas the polisario proposal, the UN envoy added “it is consistent with polisario well known positions” .As far as the role of Algeria in the conflict Mr Walsum recognized the pre-eminent role of Algeria, “Algeria has in this whole dossier (Sahara issue) played an absolutely pre-eminent ,dominant role ever since1975” this is the first time that a senior UN official dealing directly with the western Sahara issue that recognized in a diplomatic Worthing to what extent the Algerians are directly involved in the western Sahara dispute ,and even in the decision making on behalf of the separatist movement called polisario while Algiers keeps insisting that “it is not a part in the conflict”.
It was certain that the Security Council would go along with the newly nominated general, secretary of the UN Ban ki-moon’s recommendation, a move that would step up pressure for a political negotiated solution. IN his report to the Security Council Ban Ki-moon reiterated his call to the parties, including Algeria to accept the principle of direct negotiations, without any preconditions in order to reach a settlement to the three decade old Sahara conflict, he also quoted his personal envoy’s analysis saying that “the security council had consistently made it clear that it would not impose a solution to the question of western Sahara, which had led him to the conclusion that there were only two options: either indefinite prolongation of the impasse, or negotiations without preconditions between the parties aimed at achieving a mutually acceptable political solution . In fact members of the UN security council are explicitly asking Algeria to take part in any form of direct dialogue with Morocco searching for a final settlement to this conflict .it seems to me that the international community is “fed up” with the Algerian double standard policy towards the western Sahara issue…sometimes it presents itself as a concerned party, other times as an important actor, or as a party in the settlement of the dispute. If Algeria is willing ,as it claims ,to help sahraoui refugees in its own territory in Tindouf, then it has to lift the military and security blockade imposed around the camps, it would then find out that Sahraoui refugees will automatically exert the self –determination by walking from the camps and returning to their homeland in Morocco. Algeria should abandon its old dreams, and stop its non- stop allegations which are in so many respects unconvincing at all, in order to pave the way, and help to create a healthy atmosphere towards a settlement to the Western Sahara issue.
On Monday,april30,2007 the UN security council “ calls upon the parties to enter into negotiations without preconditions in good faith, taking into account the developments of the last months, with a view to achieving a just, lasting and mutually acceptable political solution”Not only the security council called for direct negotiations, but took note of the Moroccan proposal presented by Morocco to the UN general secretary “ welcome credible and serious Moroccan efforts to move the process forward towards resolution” this is in my view an explicit recognition that the Moroccan proposal is the only and unique one to be taken into consideration as a basis for any direct negotiations ,whereas the Polisario proposal did not bring any new elements nor practical alternative to the present deadlock
My view is that Algeria and the polisario would continue to create obstacles to the peace process advocated by the UN Security Council, although the polisario agreed to enter direct negotiations with Morocco, and Algeria welcomed the Security Council resolution
The Moroccan position is unequivocal; the Western Sahara is an integral part of the Kingdom of Morocco, whether Algeria and polisario come to term with the UN Security Council resolution or not.
lundi 2 juillet 2007
KENYA REAFFIRMS FREEZIN?G RECOGNITION OF SO6CALLED SADR
Kenya reaffirms freezing recognition of so-called SADR
6/27/2007
The State of Kenya reaffirmed, on Tuesday, its decision to freeze recognition of the so-called Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR), proclaimed by the Algeria-backed Polisario separatists in the Moroccan Southern Provinces, the Sahara.
This came in a joint press release, following the working visit of Moroccan Foreign Minister, Mohammed Benaissa to Kenya.
The document said Kenya welcomed favorably the Moroccan initiative for the negotiation of an autonomy statute in the Sahara that aims to find a solution to the dispute over the control of the Sahara, which broke out in 1976 between Morocco and the Polisario.
The release hailed the direct talks between the parties concerned that took place last week in Manhasset (New York outskirts) under the auspices of the United Nations.
Kenyan Foreign Minister, Raphael Tuju, voiced hope that a solution would be found to this issue, the document went on to say, recalling that Morocco has decided to restore diplomatic relations with Kenya at the level of ambassadors.
The two countries also agreed to establish a Joint Ministerial Commission to promote bilateral cooperation and exchange between the Kenyan Institute of Foreign affairs and the Moroccan Royal Academy of diplomacy.
Following a meeting with the Moroccan official, Mr. Tuju told MAP, earlier in the day, that ''Kenya decided to freeze its recognition of the SADR as a sign of commitment and friendship towards Morocco.”
The so-called SADR was only proclaimed in 1976, when Polisario separatists laid claims The Sahara, a former Spanish colony retrieved by the North African kingdom in 1975 under the Madrid Accord.
Kenya had suspended, in October 2006, its one-year old diplomatic relations with the so-called SADR. © Copyright CORCAS - 2006 -
6/27/2007
The State of Kenya reaffirmed, on Tuesday, its decision to freeze recognition of the so-called Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR), proclaimed by the Algeria-backed Polisario separatists in the Moroccan Southern Provinces, the Sahara.
This came in a joint press release, following the working visit of Moroccan Foreign Minister, Mohammed Benaissa to Kenya.
The document said Kenya welcomed favorably the Moroccan initiative for the negotiation of an autonomy statute in the Sahara that aims to find a solution to the dispute over the control of the Sahara, which broke out in 1976 between Morocco and the Polisario.
The release hailed the direct talks between the parties concerned that took place last week in Manhasset (New York outskirts) under the auspices of the United Nations.
Kenyan Foreign Minister, Raphael Tuju, voiced hope that a solution would be found to this issue, the document went on to say, recalling that Morocco has decided to restore diplomatic relations with Kenya at the level of ambassadors.
The two countries also agreed to establish a Joint Ministerial Commission to promote bilateral cooperation and exchange between the Kenyan Institute of Foreign affairs and the Moroccan Royal Academy of diplomacy.
Following a meeting with the Moroccan official, Mr. Tuju told MAP, earlier in the day, that ''Kenya decided to freeze its recognition of the SADR as a sign of commitment and friendship towards Morocco.”
The so-called SADR was only proclaimed in 1976, when Polisario separatists laid claims The Sahara, a former Spanish colony retrieved by the North African kingdom in 1975 under the Madrid Accord.
Kenya had suspended, in October 2006, its one-year old diplomatic relations with the so-called SADR. © Copyright CORCAS - 2006 -
UN-talks on sahara to resume in august
UN-led talks on Sahara to resume in august
6/20/2007
The first round of talks on Sahara between Morocco and the Algerian-backed separatist movement "Polisario" concluded, here Tuesday, with the parties promising to resume the negotiations again in August.
In a communiqué issued Tuesday after the talks, United Nations Secretary general's Personal Envoy for the Sahara, Peter van Walsum said the parties had agreed to continue their negotiations in Manhasset in the second week of August.
Earlier, U.N Secretary General's Spokesperson Michèle Montas described as "very difficult" these talks held June 18-19, at the Manhasset Greentree Estate, an exclusive venue on the outskirts of New York City, used by the United Nations Secretary General and various UN agency heads for retreats and high-level meetings.
"At this stage, it is the beginning of long process. It's not going to be an easy process (and) at this point we don’t know what part of the process will be reflected in the Secretary General’s report to the security council,” scheduled for June 30, she said. “We are now talking about very difficult negotiations and as I say the beginning of the process.”
These talks were carried out under U.N. auspices, and facilitated by the Mr. Walsum. They were also attended by representatives form neighboring Algeria and Mauritania who were “consulted separately.”
Monday’s opening session was attended by Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs B. Lynn Pascoe who said that the talks marked the beginning of a new phase in the search for a solution on Sahara. He urged the parties to proceed in good faith and to establish an atmosphere of mutual trust, and expressed the firm commitment of the United Nations to assist in the negotiations. The U.N. official also stressed that the stalemate is becoming intolerable and that the dispute over Western Sahara must be brought to a conclusion through a mutually agreed solution.
“The time has come for a solution. We wish you the best of luck, and reiterate our commitment to assist this process in every way possible," Pascoe told the meeting.
The first round of these talks were held in accordance with Security Council resolution 1754 which called on parties to enter into negotiation “without preconditions and in good faith.”
The Moroccan delegation to these talks was led by Minister for the Interior Chakib Benmoussa who underlined the need to reach a political solution to the 32-year old dispute over the former Spanish colony that was ceded by Spain to the North African country by virtue of the 1975 Madrid Accords. He made it clear that the Moment of truth has come for both parties to tackle the issue with “good faith”.
“The moment of truth has come. There can be no more hesitation, prevarication, obduracy, manoeuvring or tendentious interpretations.”, said Chakib Benmoussa.
The Moroccan delegation included Deputy Foreign Minister, Taieb Fassi Fihri, Deputy Interior Minister, Fouad Ali Al Himma, chairman of the Royal Council for Saharan Affairs (CORCAS), Khalihenna Ould Errachid, head of Morocco’s Intelligence (DGED), Mohamed Yassine Mansouri, and Morocco’s ambassador to the U.N. El Mostafa Sahel). © Copyright CORCAS - 2006 -
6/20/2007
The first round of talks on Sahara between Morocco and the Algerian-backed separatist movement "Polisario" concluded, here Tuesday, with the parties promising to resume the negotiations again in August.
In a communiqué issued Tuesday after the talks, United Nations Secretary general's Personal Envoy for the Sahara, Peter van Walsum said the parties had agreed to continue their negotiations in Manhasset in the second week of August.
Earlier, U.N Secretary General's Spokesperson Michèle Montas described as "very difficult" these talks held June 18-19, at the Manhasset Greentree Estate, an exclusive venue on the outskirts of New York City, used by the United Nations Secretary General and various UN agency heads for retreats and high-level meetings.
"At this stage, it is the beginning of long process. It's not going to be an easy process (and) at this point we don’t know what part of the process will be reflected in the Secretary General’s report to the security council,” scheduled for June 30, she said. “We are now talking about very difficult negotiations and as I say the beginning of the process.”
These talks were carried out under U.N. auspices, and facilitated by the Mr. Walsum. They were also attended by representatives form neighboring Algeria and Mauritania who were “consulted separately.”
Monday’s opening session was attended by Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs B. Lynn Pascoe who said that the talks marked the beginning of a new phase in the search for a solution on Sahara. He urged the parties to proceed in good faith and to establish an atmosphere of mutual trust, and expressed the firm commitment of the United Nations to assist in the negotiations. The U.N. official also stressed that the stalemate is becoming intolerable and that the dispute over Western Sahara must be brought to a conclusion through a mutually agreed solution.
“The time has come for a solution. We wish you the best of luck, and reiterate our commitment to assist this process in every way possible," Pascoe told the meeting.
The first round of these talks were held in accordance with Security Council resolution 1754 which called on parties to enter into negotiation “without preconditions and in good faith.”
The Moroccan delegation to these talks was led by Minister for the Interior Chakib Benmoussa who underlined the need to reach a political solution to the 32-year old dispute over the former Spanish colony that was ceded by Spain to the North African country by virtue of the 1975 Madrid Accords. He made it clear that the Moment of truth has come for both parties to tackle the issue with “good faith”.
“The moment of truth has come. There can be no more hesitation, prevarication, obduracy, manoeuvring or tendentious interpretations.”, said Chakib Benmoussa.
The Moroccan delegation included Deputy Foreign Minister, Taieb Fassi Fihri, Deputy Interior Minister, Fouad Ali Al Himma, chairman of the Royal Council for Saharan Affairs (CORCAS), Khalihenna Ould Errachid, head of Morocco’s Intelligence (DGED), Mohamed Yassine Mansouri, and Morocco’s ambassador to the U.N. El Mostafa Sahel). © Copyright CORCAS - 2006 -
King chairs working session with negotiating delegation on Sahara
6/27/2007
King Mohammed VI chaired on Monday in the Atlantic city of Agadir a working session with the delegation that participated in the first round of negotiations on the Moroccan Sahara with the Algeria-backed Polisario separatists, which took place last week in Manhasset, New York outskirts.
A press release of the Office of the King said the monarch gave his instructions for the preparation of the second round of talks scheduled for the second week of August in the same venue.
The UN-led talks that took place on June 18-19 were held in implementation of the U.N. Security Council resolution 1754, which called on the parties involved in the Sahara issue to launch direct negotiations with a view to finding a solution to the three-decade old dispute over the Sahara, Morocco's Southern Provinces.
At the end of the two-day talks, Morocco and the Polisario front agreed to meet early August, which UN Secretary General spokesperson, Michèle Montas described as a "main success." The negotiations were also attended by neighboring Algeria and Mauritania.
The monarch ordered Prime Minister, Driss Jettou, Interior Minister, Chakib Benmoussa, and Deputy Foreign Minister, Taieb Fassi Fihri (both having been members of the negotiating delegation) to enlighten the public opinion about the talks during the upcoming weekly cabinet meeting and before the Parliament.
The sovereign also charged chairman of the Royal Advisory Council for Saharan Affairs (CORCAS), Khalihenna Ould Errachid to hold an extraordinary session of the Council on Friday in the southern city of Laayoune.
The meeting was attended by member of the Royal Office, Mohamed Rochdi Chraibi, and the members of the negotiating delegation, namely Interior Minister, Chakib Benmoussa, Deputy Foreign Minister, Taieb Fassi Fihri, Deputy Interior Minister, Fouad Ali Al Himma, chairman of the Royal Council for Saharan Affairs (CORCAS), Khalihenna Ould Errachid, head of Morocco's Intelligence (DGED), Mohamed Yassine Mansouri, and Morocco’s ambassador to the U.N. El Mostafa Sahel.
© Copyright CORCAS - 2006 -
6/27/2007
King Mohammed VI chaired on Monday in the Atlantic city of Agadir a working session with the delegation that participated in the first round of negotiations on the Moroccan Sahara with the Algeria-backed Polisario separatists, which took place last week in Manhasset, New York outskirts.
A press release of the Office of the King said the monarch gave his instructions for the preparation of the second round of talks scheduled for the second week of August in the same venue.
The UN-led talks that took place on June 18-19 were held in implementation of the U.N. Security Council resolution 1754, which called on the parties involved in the Sahara issue to launch direct negotiations with a view to finding a solution to the three-decade old dispute over the Sahara, Morocco's Southern Provinces.
At the end of the two-day talks, Morocco and the Polisario front agreed to meet early August, which UN Secretary General spokesperson, Michèle Montas described as a "main success." The negotiations were also attended by neighboring Algeria and Mauritania.
The monarch ordered Prime Minister, Driss Jettou, Interior Minister, Chakib Benmoussa, and Deputy Foreign Minister, Taieb Fassi Fihri (both having been members of the negotiating delegation) to enlighten the public opinion about the talks during the upcoming weekly cabinet meeting and before the Parliament.
The sovereign also charged chairman of the Royal Advisory Council for Saharan Affairs (CORCAS), Khalihenna Ould Errachid to hold an extraordinary session of the Council on Friday in the southern city of Laayoune.
The meeting was attended by member of the Royal Office, Mohamed Rochdi Chraibi, and the members of the negotiating delegation, namely Interior Minister, Chakib Benmoussa, Deputy Foreign Minister, Taieb Fassi Fihri, Deputy Interior Minister, Fouad Ali Al Himma, chairman of the Royal Council for Saharan Affairs (CORCAS), Khalihenna Ould Errachid, head of Morocco's Intelligence (DGED), Mohamed Yassine Mansouri, and Morocco’s ambassador to the U.N. El Mostafa Sahel.
© Copyright CORCAS - 2006 -
Inscription à :
Commentaires (Atom)